Understanding the institutional role of the Board in these terms provides useful insights into the institutional design that will best help it achieve these goals. Second, by providing an independent forum for the discussion of disputed content moderation decisions, the Board can be an important forum for the public reasoning necessary for persons in a pluralistic community to come to accept the rules that govern them, even if they disagree with the substance of those rules. First, it can help highlight weaknesses in the policy formation process at Facebook, removing blockages (such as blind spots and inertia) in the “legislative process” leading to the formulation of its Community Standards. The institutional offering of the Board should focus on two primary, but more modest, functions. The true value that the Board can bring to Facebook’s content moderation ecosystem lies between these two extremes of individual error correction and the settlement of globally applicable speech rules. Were Hiring Join the Response to COVID-19 Federal Employees HR Practitioners Job Seekers Job Seekers with Disabilities Retirees & Families Veterans. Nor will it be able to become a font of globally accepted speech norms for the worldwide platform. The boards members are a diverse set of experts. Should the Oversight Board gain legitimacy, it has tremendous precedential potential for democratizing private platforms’ governance of global online speech. It will not hear a sufficient proportion of Facebook’s content moderation cases to be a meaningful response to calls for greater due process in individual decisions. The Oversight Board independently reviews some of the most difficult and significant content decisions we make. This Feature documents the creation of the Facebook Oversight Board, an independent external body that provides appellate review of Facebook’s content-moderation decisions and policy recommendations. Facebook announced the creation of its Oversight Board in 2018, when CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a note published on the site wrote that Facebook should not make so many important decisions about. For all the potential of the Facebook Oversight Board (FOB), there are many things it cannot be. With pre-existing governance of tech platforms delegitimized in the ongoing “techlash,” this represents a pivotal moment when new constitutional forms can emerge that will shape the future of online discourse. The board’s members are a diverse set of experts from all over the world who select which of our decisions to review through user appeals and cases that are referred to them by Facebook.
#FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD FULL#
You can check out Facebook's full Oversight Board Q1 review here.Facebook’s proposed Oversight Board is one of the most ambitious constitution-making projects of the modern era. The Oversight Board independently reviews some of the most difficult and significant content decisions we make. The results here provide some insight into that process, with a view to that future.Īnd they do show some promise, at least based on these early findings. The Oversight Board is really Facebook's experiment to show how this could work, and it could, eventually, provide a framework for regulation, and improving online discourse. Facebook doesn't want to be the one making the rules on what is and isn't allowed on its platform, it wants all digital platforms to come under the same rules and enforcement, which can only happen via independent assessment like this.
That could lead to more platforms, or regulatory bodies, looking to implement similar - which, really is what Facebook's Oversight Board project is all about. So the Oversight Board is having an impact, with its outside perspective helping to better shape the platform's policy approach. Facebook says that it's also updated its Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy, "creating three tiers of content enforcement for different designations of severity and adding definitions of key terms".
It can't get all of it right, all of the time, but the addition of these independent expert insights will ideally help Facebook better align with societal expectations, and lessen the potential negative impact of the platform, in helping to amplify some of the more controversial and divisive elements.įacebook says that it's already implemented various upgrades as a result of this guidance, including improved explanations for policy violations, and new tests to assess the impact of telling people about whether automation was involved in enforcement. Oversight Board selects a case appealed by a Facebook user regarding a post containing an image of an individual killed in Ukraine during the Russian invasion with text containing an excerpt from a World War II era poem.
0 kommentar(er)
